QUICK ANSWER
When a Texas broker acts as an intermediary between a buyer and seller, the broker may, with written consent from the parties, appoint separate associated license holders to work with and advise each side. These are appointed license holders. Under Texas Occupations Code Section 1101.560, an appointed license holder may give advice and opinions to the party they are appointed to. Without appointments, the broker and associated license holders may not advise either party and must stay neutral. The broker who makes the appointments is still the intermediary, and the confidentiality limits never lift.
EXAM PREP ONLY
This guide explains appointed license holders in Texas intermediary practice for the sales agent exam. It is educational content, not legal advice. Texas agency law is technical and depends on current statutes and the specific facts. Confirm the primary sources below and work under your sponsoring broker.
What is an appointed license holder?
Snippet answer: An appointed license holder is an associated license holder that an intermediary broker names, with written consent, to work with and advise one party in a transaction. Under Texas Occupations Code Section 1101.560, the broker may appoint one associated license holder to the buyer and a different one to the seller. Each appointee may then give advice and opinions to the party they represent.
Start from the intermediary problem. When one broker represents both the buyer and the seller, Texas does not allow dual agency. Instead the broker acts as an intermediary and stays neutral. A neutral broker cannot advise either side.
That neutrality is a problem for the parties, who each want real guidance. Appointments solve it. The broker appoints separate associated license holders so each party gets someone who can actually advise them.
So an appointed license holder is the person who restores advice into an intermediary deal, for one side only.
What can an appointed license holder do?
Snippet answer: An appointed license holder may give advice and opinions about the transaction to the party they are appointed to represent. That is the entire point of the appointment. The intermediary broker who made the appointments stays neutral and may not advise either party, but each appointee may advise their own side.
Here is the split that the exam tests.
| Role | May advise a party? | Neutrality |
|---|---|---|
| Intermediary broker | No | Stays neutral to both |
| Appointed license holder for the buyer | Yes, the buyer | Advises the buyer only |
| Appointed license holder for the seller | Yes, the seller | Advises the seller only |
| Associated license holder with no appointment | No | Must stay neutral like the broker |
The appointee is not a full single agent of their party in the ordinary sense. They operate inside an intermediary transaction, so the confidentiality limits below still bind them. But within those limits, they can do the thing the neutral broker cannot: give opinions and advice.
Appointments are a favorite exam trap. Run the free standards-of-conduct question set to test the intermediary and appointment rules in context.
Written consent comes first
Snippet answer: A broker may not appoint license holders without the written consent of the parties. The authority to appoint is usually built into the listing agreement and the buyer representation agreement, where the parties consent in advance to intermediary practice with appointments. No written consent means no appointments, and the broker and associates must stay neutral.
The order matters. Consent is not something the broker adds at the end. It is a precondition.
In practice, the consent lives in the representation agreements. The seller's listing agreement and the buyer's representation agreement both contain the intermediary authorization, including permission to appoint associated license holders. Those documents must include the required prohibited-conduct language in conspicuous bold or underlined print.
If that written consent is missing, the broker can still act as an intermediary, but only in the neutral form. No one gets appointed, and no one on the broker's side may advise either party.
The same-agent trap
Snippet answer: One associated license holder cannot be appointed to both the buyer and the seller. If the same agent is the only license holder working with both parties, there is no one to appoint to the other side, so the agent acts like the intermediary and may not advise either party. Appointments require two different associated license holders.
This is the trap that catches candidates. Appointments need two people.
Picture one agent who listed the seller's home and is now also working with the buyer. That single agent cannot be appointed to advise both sides, because an appointee advises one party against the interests the other appointee is advancing. There is no second appointee here.
So when the same associated license holder is the only one working with both the buyer and the seller, that agent operates under the intermediary neutrality rules. They may facilitate the transaction, but they may not advise or give opinions to either party, and they may not favor one over the other.
Appointments restore advice only when the broker has two different associated license holders to appoint.
Confidentiality does not lift
Snippet answer: Appointments never remove the intermediary confidentiality limits. Under TRELA, the intermediary and any appointed license holders may not disclose, without written authorization, that the seller will take less than the asking price, that the buyer will pay more than the offered price, the parties' motivations, or any information a party asked to be kept confidential.
This is the most tested nuance. An appointee can advise, but they cannot leak.
Even after a valid appointment, the appointed license holder is bound by the same confidentiality rules that bind the intermediary broker. They may not tell their party that the other side will accept a lower price or pay a higher one. They may not reveal a party's motivation or any information the party asked to keep confidential.
So the appointment expands advice, not disclosure. The appointee helps their own party decide, but they cannot hand over the other side's confidential position.
The broker is still the intermediary
Snippet answer: Making appointments does not change who the intermediary is. The broker remains the intermediary and stays neutral. Appointed license holders are not intermediaries; they are associated license holders authorized to advise one party inside the broker's intermediary relationship.
Do not confuse the appointee with the broker. The appointment is a delegation of the advice function, not a transfer of the intermediary role.
The broker holds the intermediary relationship, obtained the written consent, and made the appointments. The broker stays neutral to both sides. The appointees work under the broker. If the exam asks who the intermediary is, the answer is the broker, not the appointed license holder.
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between an intermediary and an appointed license holder?
The intermediary is the broker who represents both parties and stays neutral. An appointed license holder is an associated license holder the broker names, with written consent, to advise one party. The broker cannot advise either side; each appointee may advise their own side.
Can an appointed license holder give advice to their client?
Yes. That is the purpose of the appointment. Under Section 1101.560, an appointed license holder may give opinions and advice about the transaction to the party they are appointed to, within the confidentiality limits that still apply.
Do both parties have to agree to appointments?
Yes. The broker may appoint license holders only with the written consent of the parties. That consent is normally captured in the listing agreement and the buyer representation agreement before appointments are made.
Can one agent be appointed to both the buyer and the seller?
No. Appointments require two different associated license holders. If the same agent is the only one working with both parties, no appointments are possible and that agent must act under the neutral intermediary rules, advising neither party.
Does an appointment remove confidentiality restrictions?
No. The intermediary and any appointed license holders may not disclose price flexibility, motivation, or other confidential information without written authorization. Appointments allow advice, not disclosure of the other side's confidential position.
Practice questions
1. A broker acts as intermediary and, with written consent, appoints one associated license holder to the buyer and another to the seller. What may the appointees do? A. Nothing more than the neutral broker B. Advise the party each is appointed to C. Disclose the other party's bottom-line price D. Become the intermediary in place of the broker
Answer: B. Appointed license holders may give advice and opinions to the party they are appointed to. They cannot disclose confidential price information (C), and the broker remains the intermediary (D).
2. The same associated license holder is the only agent working with both the buyer and the seller. What is the result? A. The agent is appointed to both parties B. The agent may advise the buyer only C. The agent acts under neutral intermediary rules and advises neither party D. Dual agency is created
Answer: C. One agent cannot be appointed to both sides, so no appointments occur and the agent stays neutral. Texas does not allow dual agency (D), and an appointee cannot serve both parties (A).
3. Before a broker may appoint associated license holders in an intermediary transaction, what is required? A. TREC pre-approval of each appointment B. Written consent of the parties C. A separate appointment fee D. A court order
Answer: B. Appointments require the written consent of the parties, normally captured in the listing and buyer representation agreements. TREC does not pre-approve individual appointments.
4. After valid appointments are made, may an appointed license holder tell their buyer that the seller will accept less than the asking price? A. Yes, appointments remove confidentiality B. Yes, if the buyer asks directly C. No, that confidential information may not be disclosed without written authorization D. No, unless the seller is not present
Answer: C. Confidentiality limits survive appointments. Without written authorization, neither the intermediary nor an appointed license holder may reveal that the seller will take less than the asking price.
Intermediary and appointment rules are pure Texas exam points. Get Pass Texas for full agency and standards-of-conduct practice, or try a free question now.
Sources and methodology
This guide was written from Texas primary sources and reverified on July 21, 2026. It teaches exam-level agency concepts, not legal advice.
- The appointment power, the written-consent requirement, and the advice-and-opinions rule come from Texas Occupations Code Section 1101.560.
- The neutral-intermediary duties and confidentiality limits come from the intermediary sections of TRELA, Sections 1101.558 to 1101.561.
- The rule that one associated license holder cannot be appointed to both parties follows from the structure of the appointment provisions and TREC intermediary guidance.
Official source links
- Texas Occupations Code Chapter 1101 (TRELA), intermediary sections 1101.558 to 1101.561
- TREC: Intermediary, what you need to know
- TREC: failing to comply with intermediary requirements
This article is exam-prep education for the Texas real estate sales agent license. It is not legal advice, and it does not create an agency relationship. Texas intermediary and appointment rules are technical and depend on current law and the specific facts. Always confirm the current Texas statutes and TREC rules and work under the supervision of your sponsoring broker before acting.