Contracts

Statute of Frauds

The rule that contracts for the sale of real property must be in writing and signed to be enforceable.

In Texas the rule is Business and Commerce Code Section 26.01(a): an agreement listed in Section 26.01(b) is not enforceable unless it, or a memorandum of it, is in writing and signed by the person to be charged with the promise, or by someone lawfully authorized to sign for them. An oral agreement to sell land is generally not enforceable.

Two clauses matter for this exam. Section 26.01(b)(4) covers a contract for the sale of real estate. Section 26.01(b)(5) covers a lease of real estate for a term longer than one year, which means a lease of exactly one year or less falls outside the statute and may be oral.

This is why real estate purchase contracts and listing agreements are put in writing. A handshake deal for the sale of land usually fails under the Statute of Frauds. An electronic record and an electronic signature satisfy the requirement under Business and Commerce Code Sections 322.007(c) and 322.007(d).

On the exam

When a question describes an oral agreement to buy or sell land, the Statute of Frauds makes it unenforceable.

Exam trap

The contract is unenforceable, not automatically void. A party can still choose to perform; the issue is whether a court will force performance. Candidates also remember the writing and forget that Section 26.01(a)(2) wants a signature from the person to be charged.

Tested in

Contracts & Agency (13% of the exam)

From definition to recall

See this term inside a real exam question.

Pass Texas gives you Texas-specific practice, diagnostics across the 14 exam areas, Trap Library, Math Coach, offline access, and one $59.99 purchase. No subscription. No copied exam questions.

Try 5 free questions

This definition is Texas real estate exam-prep education, not legal, tax, or professional advice. Verify current rules against the official source before relying on them for a real transaction. Back to the full glossary.